Poland: a just transition case study

15 minute read

Download full paper (0.2mb)

Poland is one of the EU's most fossil fuel-exposed economies, with coal still accounting for the majority of electricity production. This paper examines how the social aspects of Poland's energy transition, if ignored, could complicate the process and carry financial consequences for bond investors.

The transition is financially material for Poland. As an EU member subject to the Emissions Trading System, Poland faces high energy costs due to its coal reliance, but a successful shift to renewables could reduce these. Poland's reliance on EU funding also means non-compliance with climate regulation risks losing access to transition finance.

Energy security adds urgency. Poland's import dependency has risen sharply, and AFII analysis shows its local currency bond yields rose more than regional peers in March 2026, when oil prices spiked during the Iran crisis — a consequence of fossil fuel exposure.

Failure to consider social risks can delay the transition. Poland's 2025 presidential election brought to power a candidate who campaigned against the EU Green Deal and has since vetoed onshore wind legislation, illustrating how failure to manage the human impact of transition can produce political outcomes that slow it down.

With the significant investment required to fund Poland’s shift from fossil fuels, bond markets will play a sizable role. Just transition-aligned projects are not included in the eligible categories of Poland’s latest Green Bond Framework update, meaning bond investors have an engagement opportunity to ensure these social risks are being addressed.