Climate risk pricing

Big Oil's terrible day: Bond market (lack of) reactions

Written by Ulf Erlandsson & Nona Alexander

Download full paper (0.1mb)

We review the small - if any - moves in credit spreads during the week of a barrage of news flow with regards to big oil companies such as Exxon, Shell, Chevron and Total. The lack of action in credit is juxtaposed versus moves in equities.

Historically, equity momentum has been a strong predictor of credit spreads. There were several core events recently, including a successful challenge to Exxon management to place more climate aligned representatives on the board, Shell losing a court case in the Netherlands and forced toward sharp CO2 reduction targets, Chevron’s board losing out versus a climate activist proposal, and Total seeing off another climate proposal.

Since then, the companies’ equities underperformed by 2-4.5% versus indexes. Amongst the companies, most noticeable was Shell with the main underperformance after the court ruling. On the other hand, fixed income hardly moved at all, in terms of outright spreads as well as curve shapes. There are several reasons for the lack of movement in credit compared with equities. For example, fixed income investors do not believe these new company trajectories are credible, and/or will not affect credit quality even in the long-run.

About the authors

Ulf Erlandsson

Ulf Erlandsson

Founder, Board member

Dr Ulf Erlandsson founded the Anthropocene Fixed Income Institute and was its first CEO. A pioneer of climate-focused fixed income portfolio management, he was named Environmental Finance’s Bond Personality of the Year 2022.

Before you sign up

By completing this form, you agree to AFII sharing information that we think you may be interested in, including our insights on climate transition. See our Data Protection Policy for more information about how we collect and use your personal data, and any rights you may have in relation to your personal data. You may opt out from our distribution list at any time.