Climate risk pricing

bp and ConocoPhillips: a bond spread curve ball

Written by Josephine Richardson

Download full paper (0.2mb)

The low-carbon transition promises to lower demand for fossil fuels. But the market is not differentiating among oil & gas producers based on their production targets, suggesting transition risk is going unpriced.

Carbon Tracker, an NGO, recently published an updated ranking of oil & gas producers based on how misaligned they are with the Paris Agreement. While none of the firms assessed are on target, bp was identified as the ‘least worst’ performer and topped the ranking, while ConocoPhillips took the bottom spot.

This in turn suggests that bp is less exposed to transition risk than ConocoPhillips. However, our analysis shows that their bond curves are almost identical, with the market pricing the 10s30s forward credit risk of the two issuers at virtually indistinguishable levels.

The potential for a dramatic repricing of long-dated bond spreads is possible considering the trajectory of current climate policies, suggesting investors should carefully consider the adequacy of oil & gas firms’ transition plans when making investment decisions.

About the author

Josephine Richardson

Josephine Richardson

Managing Director, Head of Research

Based in London, Jo leads AFII’s research and a global team supporting fixed income investors as they align their portfolios with climate and sustainability goals. She joined AFII after 18 years in fixed income markets at JPMorgan.

Before you sign up

By completing this form, you agree to AFII sharing information that we think you may be interested in, including our insights on climate transition. See our Data Protection Policy for more information about how we collect and use your personal data, and any rights you may have in relation to your personal data. You may opt out from our distribution list at any time.